The apparel market in Belgium and the Netherlands shows a different dynamic from furniture: more frequent, more emotional, but still strongly price-driven. Belgium and the Netherlands display similar behaviors, with some notable differences in perceived quality, price importance, and sustainable engagement.Contact us

Fashion retail in BENE: price trade-offs, moderate loyalty, and rise of second-hand

High awareness, dominated by major brands

Top brands enjoy massive awareness:

  • H&M (83%)
  • C&A (81%)
  • Nike and Adidas (81%)
  • Zara (73%)

National differences remain limited, but we observe:

  • Slight outperformance of sports brands in the Netherlands (Nike 83%, Adidas 83%)
  • Stronger presence of C&A in Belgium (83% vs. 80%)

Current customers: fast fashion and sports dominate

For current customers, H&M and C&A lead (33% each overall).
Nike (25%) and Adidas (21%) confirm the importance of the sports segment.

Belgium appears slightly more engaged with generalist major brands (C&A 36% vs. 29% in the Netherlands).

Purchase intentions: sports and value lead

For the next purchase:

  • C&A leads (40%)
  • H&M follows (37%)
  • Nike (30%) and Adidas (28%) remain highly attractive

In the Netherlands, intentions for Nike (34%) and Adidas (32%) are particularly strong.

The sportswear segment remains structurally important in purchase projections.

Perceived quality: advantage Belgium

Quality perception is moderate:

  • 46% rate it as good or very good
  • 37% rate it average or poor

But a gap appears:

  • Belgium: 51% net good
  • Netherlands: 40% net good

The Dutch are more critical (40% average/poor).

Purchase frequency declining

Most buy occasionally (57%) or rarely (19%).
Only 23% report buying often.

Compared to two years ago:

  • 39% buy less
  • 18% buy more
  • 43% buy the same

Belgium shows a slightly more marked decline (42% buying less).

The market remains constrained by the economic environment.

Price becomes central, especially in Belgium

66% report that price is now more important than before.

The gap is significant:

  • Belgium: 72%
  • Netherlands: 60%

The Dutch are more likely to feel that price hasn’t increased in importance (35%).

Budget pressure seems more felt in Belgium.

What triggers purchase: need first, promotion second

The primary trigger remains functional:

  • 48% buy for a specific need
  • Promotion comes second (19%), but:
    • Belgium: 26%
    • Netherlands: 11%

Online content plays a more significant role in the Netherlands (8% vs. 4% in Belgium).
The Netherlands appears slightly more influenced by digital.

Moderate loyalty, but stronger than in furniture

53% declare loyalty to one or more brands (56% in Belgium, 50% in the Netherlands).

The fashion market thus retains a stronger identity dimension than furniture.

Second-hand: an established practice

42% buy second-hand clothes (regularly or occasionally).

The dynamic is similar in both countries.

Second-hand is now part of regular habits rather than a marginal trend.

Top expectations: price first

As in furniture, price dominates:

  • 39% expect more accessible prices
  • 22% expect better quality
  • 16% expect credible sustainable commitments

The Netherlands shows a stronger sustainability expectation (18% vs. 13% in Belgium).

Would you like to launch a study and learn more about YouGov’s solutions?Contact us

Methodology

YouGov Surveys:
Online study conducted on YouGov’s proprietary panel
Belgium: 1,009 adults aged 18 and over. Data are weighted to be representative of the national population in Belgium. Fieldwork conducted in Belgium from 2 to 5 February 2026.
Netherlands: 1,000 adults aged 18 and over. Data are weighted to be representative of the national population in the Netherlands. Fieldwork conducted in the Netherlands from 2 to 5 February 2026.
Significantly higher at 95% confidence vs. national representative sample

Abonnez-vous à la newsletter YouGov