With the rising popularity of e-readers, such as the highly successful Amazon Kindle, many have replaced their traditional âpaper formatâ books with electronically downloaded equivalents.
While technologyâs ever increasing presence in our everyday lives means that new and popular literature is becoming accessible with the mere click of a button, the reverse effect of this is that booksellers and libraries are feeling the pinch as a result of a drop in patrons, amid speculation that written works in the printed format may be on the way out.
But even with e-readers' success, do people really believe that the paper format, which has existed for thousands of years and played a huge part of the worldâs development, could ever be rendered obsolete? Do people harbour a preference for reading on either paper or an e-reader device?
We asked people why they think electronic readers should replace books, newspapers and magazines; the pros and cons of owning an e-reader, and contrastingly, if physical books should remain at the forefront of publishing.

Tradition vs. technology: which do you prefer and why?ï»ż
Join the debate using the Disqus comments section below!

Argument 1: "E-readers will eventually replace printed books"
Hereâs what our poll participants had to say:
âIt seems obvious that in a world where all other media has gone digital, sooner or later print will follow suitâ Kindle Lover, UK

âThey are already working on paper-like screens that can be rolled up. Paper will become obsolete, although we are not there yetâ Paul W, Brighton
âYoung people rarely wear watches anymore, because they use their mobiles as their time pieces. The same is happening with music. These changes happened quickly and the same will happen with e-booksâ Anonymous
âIt will become too expensive for paper-based products to be produced. Once the majority of people are familiar with the technology, there will come a time when books start to only be released electronicallyâ Jim K, Guildford
âWhen they become commonplace in schools and children grow up reading on them as standard, I think that will be the first death knell of the paper format bookâ Graeme S, Aberdeen
âChildren are more likely to convert to e-readers as they grow up. Older generations are more likely to remain faithful to paper format. But like vinyl records there will always be a demand and paper will not entirely die outâ CrisH, Isle of Wight

âPublishers need to embrace the new technology, taking the opportunity to broaden the range of authors available. It is the perfect time to trial new authors who would previously have been too much of a risk due to print costsâ Anonymous
âAs e-readers become more affordable and offer more features (moving images, interactivity, in built dictionaries, ability to highlight text, email passages to reference in essays etc.) I can see them eventually replacing books as the prime format for literatureâ Richard G, Coventry
Argument 2: "The printed format should remain!"
âA good book has a magical qualityâ Rita, UK

âSchools with libraries and archives use the paper format to easily track, amend, and display their collections in accessible ways. Although the digital format is increasingly being adopted by institutions, this is usually intended to be a counterpart format to the paper format, which is accessible to more peopleâ Anonymous, Norfolk
âThere is nothing like the feel and smell of a well-read book or the aura of a large libraryâ Mags, Bingley
âBooks and bookshelves add to the decor of a room and peopleâs choice of book on shelves is often a talking point or an ice-breaker for guests. One can 'lend' or 'give' a book to a friendâ Liz Mac, Felixstowe
âBooks are highly suitable for use with children and are more memorable and easy to interact with. A paper book can be a treasured possessionâ Anonymous
âThere is an unexplainable aspect of reading in paper format, a classic tradition and class about it. A book read many times can give the paper a wrinkled historical look to itâ Anonymous
âI still relish the feel and smell of a paper based book. The crisp, unbent spine on a new book, the way ink smudges on my fingers, and the smell of the paper. These are all part of my reading experienceâ FG, Durham
âBooks can hold value, and first editions can become quite valuable - something that will never happen with e-booksâ Mark H, Kent
âThe joy of looking through old books will never be achieved with a Kindle. I am about to turn 60 this year and have just passed on âWind in the Willowsâ - a book given to my for my 8th birthday - to my granddaughter, she loves it as I do and didâ Cal, Chester

âBooks are special, they make good gifts, it feels like you've got something really good when holding them, you can annotate them for essays, and they look good on a bookshelf. What's not to love?â Gilly R, Telford
âReading a book isn't just about the words on the page - it's about the feel of a linen cover, the worn look of a well-loved book, the handwritten inscription of a book given to you by a loved one that brings back so many other memories and the wonderful musty smell of a book that has passed through many handsâ Anonymous, Cornwall
âBooks are about more than the story or a collection of wordsâ Suzi W, Farnborough
âI am unlikely to replace my existing library of books with electronic versions. Many of the books I have bought in the last few years are either out of print or show no sign of becoming available in electronic formatâ Anonymous
âThe printed word is reassuringly solid. The copy of â1984â that's sitting on my bookshelf doesn't suddenly vanish at the whim of the publisher. Books are here to stayâ ED, Northampton
âI like the feel, the touch, the smell of a book. One read it becomes part of me and I want that actual copy on my shelves. I can then pick it up and just read a page and it reminds me of time when I first read itâ Anonymous, Lincolnshire

âI enjoy the process of shopping for books - looking at the covers, reading the blurb, flicking through the pages, which you cannot do onlineâ Louise, High Wycombe
âI love the anticipation when you open a book you haven't read before. I like the fact you can jump from one page to another quickly and easily to compare pictures for example. I love the smell of a new book and the crisp unturned pagesâ Ellie, Berkshire
âI think that paper media is more flexible than e-readers. After all you can take a book with you to the North Pole or the Sahara without worrying how you're going to charge itâ David B, Princes Risborough
âI work on a computer all day, so a book is a way of switching offâ Hannah, Oxford
1. What do you think are the pros and cons of e-readers?
Pros
âIt's cheaper to purchase books, and just as easy - if not easier - to read. Also e-readers are easier to carry aroundâ Jane, Kent

âIt saves a trip to the charity shop when I've read the book & no longer need itâ Anonymous, Chepstow
âIt is easy to download the book of your choice. No waiting for it to arrive by post or go shopping as it is instantaneousâ Margaret, West Lothian
âE-books take up less room in the house than books and magazines and as homes get smaller this will become a factor. Also disposing of papers and magazines may eventually become expensive as landfill sites become more scary and expensiveâ Anonymous
âSince I started using an e-reader I am reading more than I used toâ Margaret, Lancashire
âI am totally satisfied with my e-reader, carrying and storing new books, the total ease of buying new books; daily offers encouraging me to look at books by new authorsâ Cal, Chester
âE-readers are great for researching and for reading when on public transportâ DG Gloucestershire
âSaving paper, saving the planet, no ink on your fingers, better costâ D. Wolves, UK

âParticularly useful when going on holiday as I donât have to take paper books which take up too much of the weight allowanceâ Anonymous
âThe e-reader is good for out of print booksâ DG Gloucestershire
âAnything that encourages reading is a good thing whatever format it is inâ Anonymous
âI can take it with me wherever I goâŠI can buy hundreds of books and even newspapers and keep them on that one tiny space and I can find what I want to read at the touch of a button. Magicâ Granny Carol, Dorset
âE-readers are great for those with poor sight as you can increase size of print. I have read so much more since having itâ Anonymous
Cons
âAt the moment e-readers aren't a particularly pleasant experience, many are expensive and there are several incompatible formats. They need care, charging and looking after and losing it would be bad newsâ Pete, Lancashire

âI sympathise with the issue of payment to authors as they are being expected to write for less and less payâ Anonymous
âThere is something soulless about downloaded reading matter. You do not get the sense that it has been made with any real feeling â it has been produced solely to make moneyâ Anonymous
âIt is very sad to think that perhaps future generations will not know the joy of books. How many people have picked up a book from a shelf by pure chance only to have an entirely different world opened up to them? With the new screen book technology we make ourselves more ignorant, less curious and intellectually impoverishedâ Angela, London
âThe move to electronic books would further damage the libraries in the UK. I read an interview with Jodie Picoult yesterday in the Times in which she says that authors are losing out on electronic books financiallyâ Anonymous, London
âAs someone studying graphic design and illustration I do not believe e-readers are versatile enough to suitably display all types of publications. Qualities such as page size and paper quality are lost, as well as any varnishes or cut-outsâ Richard G, Coventry
âIt could make people lazier in their choice of literature not having to shop or visit librariesâ Sid, Rhos-on-Sea
âI wouldn't want to go for a swim and leave an e-reader unattended on a beach, whereas I have never had a book or newspaper stolenâ Anonymous

âE-readers are cold and impersonalâ Anonymous
âI am not enamoured with relying on electronic devices for everythingâ Rob S, East Yorks
âBecause I read in the bath, I would be afraid I'd drop the e-reader in the waterâ Phrag, Wirral
âI have found with an e-reader that if someone asks me what I am reading I can't remember the title, as I never see the front cover to remind meâ Barb M, Merseyside
âA book is a permanent object in relative terms whereas computer devices have storage which is subject to failure and loss of contentâ Tony N, Reading
âLooking at a screen feels unnatural. You can't flick back to a certain page in quite the same way as you can with a book, and it doesn't feel the same holding itâ Mark H, Kent
âReading a book is a tactile experience. By comparison the e-book is unsympathetic - even boring. I have still to read a complete book on itâ Patricia, Oxford
âSecurity issues when carrying an expensive e-reader in public. I wouldn't feel safe using oneâ Mark H, Kent
âIt is hard to share an e-newspaper, but you can split a paper newspaper so you can share itâ Anonymous
âIf I wrote a novel, I'd like to see it as a book rather than as merely an electronic entity on people's e-readersâ Baz, Swansea
âReading a book is relaxing whereas reading from a machine is like being at workâ Anonymous
ï»żâI like collecting series of books e.g. Terry Pratchett's âDiscworldâ and an e-reader can't replace thatâ Anonymous

âPrimarily you are a victim of the 'must have the latest gadget' hype. As a non-fiction loving person I need paper based sourcesâ JHW, Washington
âI struggle to remember where I am in a novel/book with an e-readerâ Baz, Swansea
âYou canât read electronic devices when taking off and landing on a plane. Some things you want to be able to write onâ Anonymous
âI would like the e-reader to be just that ... I don't want any extras (they're already adding lots of apps). I have my mobile, my pc. I'd like my e-reader to be full of books and nothing elseâ Elinor M, Midlands
âI can't cut out & collate any articles on a single theme from various sources or pass well-read magazines onto a friend without incurring copyright issues...â AMM, Edinburgh
Argument 3: "A happy medium is possible"
âKindle definitely has its uses and I am glad I own one but I donât think e-readers will replace newspapers and in particular books. The feel of reading/browsing through a book cannot be found in Kindle or similar device. E-readers are an 'as well as' rather than 'instead of' deviceâ Anonymous

âI rather think I will grow to love the e-book but I'm very sure I won't get rid of my existing collection of over 6,000 hard copy booksâ AMM, Edinburgh
âI mostly already have stopped reading things in paper format--it's just that there are a few things still more convenient to read on paper (e.g. the free newspaper on the train)â Anonymous
âI can take (an e-reader) with me with plenty of books loaded, and the e-reader isn't heavy. I also love books, they're a part of my life and I think they can quite happily work alongside the e-reader. There's plenty of room for bothâ Elinor M, Midlands
âPublications with a short-life span, such as newspapers, I already access on-line; similarly for specialist magazines and journals, extracts from which I tend to access on-line, downloading and printing off those I may need to keepâ Paul S, London
âWe would not have the skill of illuminated manuscripts if we got rid of paper books. Readers are okay in certain things but we must never get rid of booksâ Julie M, Mirfield
âYou cannot replace the feel of a book in onesâ hand. I do read eBooks now but still prefer a ârealâ book. Mostly use eBook when travelling or late at night to read in bed when partner asleepâ Anonymous
âE-readers are OK for taking a lot of books on holiday so you can save on the luggage allowance, but I won't be chucking out all my books anytime soonâ Baz, Swansea
âThe Kindle is fine for reading books etc. but to view photographs associated with the story the pictures are not so good out of focus too small to view the overall sizing is a problem. Particularly mapsâ Anonymous
I think I will read less on paper but not give it up completely. I like to collect sets of my favourite fiction paperbacks. I'm not totally against reading more on screen but I'm not sure it is good for your eyesâ Linz, Sussex coast

Tradition vs. technology: which do you prefer and why?ï»ż
Join the debate using the Disqus comments section below!
