If an MP has been accused of a serious crime but they have NOT been charged by the police, do you think they should be publicly identified, or should they remain anonymous until/unless they are charged? | Daily Question

If an MP has been accused of a serious crime but they have NOT been charged by the police, do you think they should be publicly identified, or should they remain anonymous until/unless they are charged? Published on 3 August 2020 → Survey conducted on 3 August 2020 on 1833 GB adults

All adults

Region

Gender

Politics

Age

Should be publicly identified

25%

Should remain anonymous until/unless they are charged

63%

Not sure

11%

Should be publicly identified

25%

Should remain anonymous until/unless they are charged

63%

Not sure

11%

Share your view and join YouGov so your views are reflected in our research in the future

Now, thinking specifically about your own constituency, if there were a general election held tomorrow and these were the parties standing, which party would you vote for?